Firearms Training

Front Sight Blog: Didn’t Take Long for Gun Grabbers to Grab on to “Not So Smart” Guns…

February 23rd, 2014  

It didn’t take long…

As I predicted in my blog yesterday, a gun grabbing Democratic Senator, Edward Markey from Massachusetts, using the worn out rhetoric that his legislation “will make it harder for stolen guns to be used in crimes and will reduce accidental firearm deaths by making it impossible for children to fire guns” has grabbed on to the “not so smart” gun technology and introduced legislation requiring ALL guns to be “not so smart” guns.

We all know this is nothing but a smoke screen for another gun law that will restrict the number of new guns available to responsible Americans, but that doesn’t stop a mental midget like Senator Markey from wasting taxpayer dollars. He also called for Obama to include $10 million in his budget proposal for gun violence research. Really? Hey Senator Markey…are you really that stupid or are you simply not doing your job? That research was already funded by Obama Executive Order after Sandy Hook. And guess what? The research showed that you and Obama and Feinstein and Bloomberg and Holder and those like you ARE WRONG ABOUT GUNS CAUSING VIOLENT CRIME.

That’s right! Obama shot himself in the foot because the study he ordered, titled, Priorities for Research to Reduce the Threat of Firearm-related Violence, revealed the following:

1. Suicides, not violent encounters with guns, represent over 60% of all gun related deaths. Take the suicides out of the statistical analysis and the US has one of the lowest per capita death by guns statistics in the world. (Get rid of psych drugs and you will immediately lower the suicide rate and the mass shootings as well.)
2. Those using a gun to defend themselves have consistently and significantly LOWER injures in violent encounters than those without a gun to defend themselves. This throws cold water on the gun grabbers claims that a gun in YOUR hand or in YOUR home is likely to be used against you by a criminal in a violent encounter.
3. Defensive use of guns are at least as common as offensive uses by criminals, with estimates of citizens using guns to defend themselves more than 3 million times per year! So the next time you hear Obama, Biden, Bloomberg, Feinstein or any gun grabbing moron cry, “If we can just save one child…” get in their face and ask, “Why are you asking the American people to sacrifice 3 million responsible citizens EVERY YEAR to save one child?”
4. Overall, gun related deaths are declining, during the same period that gun ownership has SOARED!
5. So MORE GUNS means LESS CRIME.

We did not need to waste taxpayers’ dollars to prove what we, as gun owners, already knew. And Senator Markey, you should read the report and stop wasting everyone’s time and even more taxpayer money with your ridiculous legislation and request for another $10 million dollar “gun violence” study. The facts are NOT in your favor!

It is simple, school-yard common sense that when guns are taken from responsible citizens it shifts the balance of power into the hands of the criminals on the street and the criminals in our government. Obama, Biden, Feinstein, Bloomberg and their ilk don’t give a crap about saving one child. They want to disarm the American public because they fear an armed populace. They are willing to use children in the most heinous, public relations scheme to accomplish their goal of disarming us. Shame on them.

So if you missed it, here is my blog from yesterday that needs to be forwarded everywhere so consumers will not make the unenlightened mistake of believing that a “smart” gun is a good choice. Those who know, (and are not making a buck off it) will tell you that “smart” guns are not a smart choice at all.

Read the article and then see how my comments expose the “smart” gun for what it really is… an answer searching for a question and the gun of choice for unenlightened fools and gun grabbers like Democratic Senator Markey from Massachusetts.

(On a side note, do you ever wonder how the state that birthed the Boston Tea Party, could fall so far from grace to keep a man like the late, no-so-great Ted Kennedy in office so long and continue to elect gun grabbing Senators like Markey? It boggles my mind…)

Here is the article…

First ‘smart’ pistol hits shelves in California

By Brendan McGarry

The first so-called “smart gun” has hit the shelves at U.S. retail outlets, including one of the biggest firearms stores in California, according to the Washington Post.

The Smart System iP1, a .22-caliber pistol made by the German gun-maker Armatix GmbH, can only function with an accompanying wristwatch, which is sold separately.

When the RFID-equipped watch is activated by a PIN number and placed near the gun — like when a shooter grips the handle — it sends a signal to unlock the gun and a light on the back of the weapon turns green, according to the report. Otherwise, the firearm stays locked and the light on the back remains red, it stated.

The pistol sells for $1,399 and the watch retails for another $399 — more than double the cost of .40-caliber Glock handgun, according to the article.

The company is betting that demand for the technology will increase as consumers seek guns modified for safety.

OK, here are my comments…

Gun owners are not stupid, especially gun owners who are serious about using a gun to defend oneself or family and have taken any formal training. We all know that a gun is supposed to be dangerous. The fact that a gun is dangerous makes it a weapon to be respected by those who wield it and feared by those it is used against. Technology to make a gun safer and “smarter” by requiring the user to wear a watch to shoot it is utterly ridiculous for a long list of reasons. Here are a few…

1. As a CCW holder, do you want to have to wear a watch wherever you go so your gun will fire when you need it to fire?
2. Are you going to wear your watch to bed so if you hear breaking glass in the middle of the night, your gun will fire when you need it to fire?
3. If you don’t have your watch on and need your gun, now you have to fumble around trying to find your watch and put it on before you can use your gun? “Honey, have you seen my gun watch?”
4. Even if you have your watch on and you have your gun, now you are relying on something electrical and wireless to “communicate” before your gun will fire. How are those universal remote controls working out for you? Yeah, me too! How many times do you have to hit the reset button on the WiFi in your house so everything that is wireless will connect smoothly? How often does your Internet network go down? How often do you have to restart your computer? I think you get my point.
5. What about the batteries that run the gun and run the watch? Just your luck that one or both have run low for that handgun you keep in the nightstand… on the night you need it most! What happens to the wireless headsets at Front Sight when the batteries start getting low? The headsets work intermittently. So what is the malfunction clearance drill for a “smart” gun with a low battery? Time out home invader! I have to change my “smart” gun battery!
6. What about your wife or son or daughter who is home alone when the bad guys break in? “Damn it. Here’s the gun but where’s that watch? Johnny, you had the watch last! No I didn’t, Dad did. Look in the garage! He was dry practicing there last night! HURRY!”
7. I could go on and on with scenario after scenario that shows what a DUMB idea the “smart gun” is, but the best reason to boycott “smart” guns is the fact that the anti-gunners love the idea of the “smart” gun. They like the fact that you will not be as dangerous (free, mobile, unobstructed, unrestricted, unleashed, and undeterred) when you are saddled with a “smart” gun. And for that reason alone you should never purchase one and allow this “answer in search of a question” gun, AKA “only the dumb will buy” gun, AKA “not so smart” gun to languish on the shelves of retailers foolish enough to stock them. “Not so smart” guns will die a quick death if we don’t buy the BS. And that is what a “not so smart” gun is…BS.
8. And make sure you support all your pro-gun organizations who now have to fight the Gun Grabbers who will want to make “smart” guns mandatory, just like they pushed mandatory micro-stamping, and mandatory drop tests. Their false claims of needing such minutia for public safety is nothing more than a smoke screen for back door gun restrictions. When gun makers cannot comply with the additional tooling, or to do so drives their cost of manufacturing to the point they can no longer compete on the open market, the result is less and less “truly smart” guns on the market…the guns any member of your gun-trained family can pick up to shoot rapidly and reliably.
9. Isn’t it interesting that we can no longer purchase new HK 91’s or 93’s or P7’s or MP5’s but our government thinks we will want these German POS “not so smart” guns, that can be communicated with remotely and “turned off” if needed? Hmmm. If those were the only type of guns during the Rodney King Riots or the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, or after the Boston Bombing or 9/11 do you think any of your guns would have been working? The government feels much safer in those situations when THEY are the only ones with the guns, but those smart Koreans on the roof tops of their buildings during the Rodney King Riots had the right technology for the situation at hand!
10. Notice lately how your “smart” phone is taken over with Amber Alerts in California? I never signed up for that, did you? If they can activate your “smart” phone when you never gave them your number, they can deactivate your “not so smart” gun when you need it most!
11. What about natural disasters, EMP’s, solar flares, dirty bomb technology, etc. All the stuff that we are told will knock out electronics for months at a time? I know, I’m sounding like one of those “Preppers.” Well, if anything does ever happen like that, throw your battery-operated crap away cause it’s just gonna’ slow you down. Iron sights will rule the new world!
12. I also find it interesting that the military and police aren’t wearing gun watches and “smart” guns. If this was the latest and greatest technology, you’d think the government would have it first and NOT want us citizens to have it. Of course, the “smart” gun is not so smart and is just another way to control weapons and the people using them. The police and military know what “smart’ guns are really for and so should you!
13. Have I hammered this “not so smart” gun enough for you to send this e-mail to everyone you know and encourage them to do the same? As gun owners, let’s not be idiots. Friends don’t let friends buy “not so smart” guns. If we don’t educate the population, the government will and their idea of education is gun control, AKA people control. Say NO to the “not so smart” gun and let it die a quick death, collecting dust on the shelves of every retailer foolish enough to stock it.

Please forward this e-mail, to everyone you know and encourage them to do the same. Spread the truth about WHY every responsible citizen needs to be armed and trained with REAL “smart” guns… the guns any member of your gun-trained family can pick up to shoot rapidly and reliably.

And be part of the solution for a stronger America! Take advantage of our 5 Day Defensive Handgun Course, 30 State Concealed Weapon Permit and our entire set of 7 training manuals (over $2700 in total value) for only $200. Get yourself and your family trained!

That’s right! Only $200. But you will need to act fast. Go here http://www.frontsight.com/patriot/ to grab a 5 Day Front Sight Course, plus 30 State Concealed Weapons Permit, and our entire set of 7 Front Sight Training Manuals for only $200. Just do it before the offer sells out!

And here is a great video we recently created so you can share it with your family and friends:

I highly recommend you view it in 720 (a selection you can make at the bottom of the video window)…so you can see all the awesome detail.

Sincerely,

Dr. Ignatius Piazza
Founder and Director
Front Sight Firearms Training Institute
7975 Cameron Drive, #900
Windsor, CA 95492
http://www.frontsight.com
info@frontsight.com
1.800.987.7719

Entry Filed under: Dr. Ignatius Piazza,Front Sight,Gun Training,Handgun Training,Monday Blog Posts,Newsletter,second amendment,Self Defense.