If not the Supreme Court, If not the States or Congress, then what? President Trump has options to save the Republic…
December 11th, 2020
As we head toward a resolution of the 2020 Presidential Election, one thing is abundantly clear, we are running full steam ahead into uncharted waters, with a Category 5 storm waiting for us on the January 20, 2021 horizon.
We need to be prepared for what is coming. With that in mind, we need to discuss where we are today, and what are the likely options as we approach January 20, 2021…
The lawsuit Texas filed against Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin and Georgia to overturn the 2020 Presidential Election and award the rightful victory to President Donald Trump now has 19 other states supporting the lawsuit by either Intervening (joining) Texas in the lawsuit or filing an Amicus Brief, which is a “Friend of the Court” letter to the Court in favor of the lawsuit, spelling out various legal arguments for the Supreme Court to consider.
106 Republican Members of the House of Representatives have also filed an Amicus Brief in support of the lawsuit Texas filed.
And President Trump himself has intervened (joined) the Texas lawsuit.
But what is most interesting is Republican members of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives and even a Senator from Pennsylvania have already filed Amicus Briefs IN FAVOR of the Texas lawsuit AGAINST THEIR OWN State. I suspect Republican legislators from WI, Mi and GA will do the same.
Here are four articles to educate you on the details…
BREAKING: Arizona Joins Texas SCOTUS Lawsuit For Total of 19 States Suing Over Election Integrity
A total of 19 states are headed to the Supreme Court to challenge the elections held in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia.
by JACK HADFIELD – December 9, 2020
Arizona has joined 18 other states in supporting Texas’s lawsuit in SCOTUS against Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia, over election integrity.
As National File previously reported, the crux of the Texas lawsuit is that the swing states of Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin violated their duties under the US Constitution, by illegally altering legislated election laws, treating voters unequally, and allowing numerous voting irregularities to take place as a result.
Much of the argument rests on the election laws changed regarding mail-in ballots, where executives, such as the Secretarys of State, pulled back the deadlines for the acceptance of these ballots, with some dates even being after November 3rd itself. These changes were enacted unilaterally, without the consent of the legislature.
“Plaintiff State respectfully submits that the foregoing types of electoral irregularities exceed the hanging-chad saga of the 2000 election in their degree of departure from both state and federal law,” the motion before the Supreme Court states.
106 House Republicans Sign Brief Backing Texas Supreme Court Lawsuit Against Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia and Wisconsin
By Cristina Laila
Published December 10, 2020 at 5:32pm
Published December 10, 2020 at 5:32pm
106 House Republicans signed an amicus brief backing Texas’ Supreme Court lawsuit against Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia and Wisconsin.
“This brief presents [our] concern as Members of Congress, shared by untold millions of their constituents, that the unconstitutional irregularities involved in the 2020 presidential election cast doubt upon its outcome and the integrity of the American system of elections,” states the brief signed by 106 GOP lawmakers.
President Trump Files Motion to Join Texas Supreme Court Lawsuit Against Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin and Georgia
By Cristina Laila
Published December 10, 2020 at 2:33pm
The state of Texas sued Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin on Monday night with the US Supreme Court challenging their unlawful election procedures.
Texas argued these four states violated the US Constitution because they made changes to voting rules and procedures through the courts or through executive actions. But these states did not make the changes through the state legislatures as spelled out in the US Constitution.
President Trump Wednesday evening filed a motion to intervene to join Texas’ lawsuit because he is “the real party in interest.”
House Leaders File Brief to Support Texas in Supreme Court Lawsuit Against Pennsylvania
BY JACK PHILLIPS
December 10, 2020 – Updated: December 11, 2020
Pennsylvania‘s House speaker and majority leader on Thursday filed an amici curiae brief with the Supreme Court against the state of Pennsylvania and in favor of Texas‘s lawsuit against the commonwealth and three other states.
A brief (pdf) filed by Pennsylvania House Speaker Bryan Cutler and Majority Leader Kerry Benninghoff, both Republicans, requests that the Supreme Court “carefully consider the procedural issues and questions raised by the Plaintiff concerning the administration of the 2020 General Election in Pennsylvania.”
“The unimpeachability of our elections requires clear procedures of administration so that everyone gets a fair shake. Unfortunately, outside actors have so markedly twisted and gerrymandered the Commonwealth’s Election Code to the point that amici find it unrecognizable from the laws that they enacted,” they wrote, adding that the state of Texas “raised important questions about how this procedural malfeasance affected the 2020 General Election.”
And here is a very informative and very interesting video that explains all of it…
NOTE: The Texas case is not about the overwhelming evidence of fraud in the election. It is about the violation of voting laws in PA, MI WI and GA creating an Equal Protection Under the Law constitutional case for the Supreme Court to decide.
So what happens IF the Supreme Court rules in favor of Texas, President Trump and the other states who have joined and support Texas in their arguments, that state voting laws were violated by Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Georgia, and the decision of electors should be given back to the legislators of those four states?
The Republican controlled legislature of PA, WI, MI, and GA then choose the Electors, and they will almost certainly choose President Trump and award him the election. What will happen then is we will see the greatest riots we have even seen in the history of the country. Every major city, every minor city, every town and every suburb will potentially be affected and it will continue until we rise up and stop them..
So what happens IF the Supreme Court DOES NOT RULE IN FAVOR of Texas?
Then the Republican controlled Legislatures on PA, WI, MI, GA, NV, and AZ could meet, AND SHOULD MEET to legally take back their authority to appoint Electors for their state, and appoint them to President Trump, making him, the rightful winner of the 2020 Presidential Election. Of course, if they do this, we will see the greatest riots we have even seen in the history of the country, and the riots will continue until we rise up to stop them.
So what happens, IF in the face of ALL the overwhelming evidence of massive fraud in this election, that I have gathered and chronicled every day since November 4 in MY BLOG, the Supreme Court does not rule in favor of President Trump, AND the Republican controlled State Legislatures of PA, WI, MI, GA, NV, and AZ do not acknowledge the fraud and take back authority to appoint their own Electors in favor of President Trump?
Then the US House of Representatives must count the Electors submitted by the States and determine which candidate has secured at least 270 Electoral College votes, granting that candidate the win. However, if for any reason, such as ongoing litigation in a State’s certification process preventing them from submitting their Electoral College votes, neither candidate has 270 Electoral College votes, the US House of Representatives will hold a ONE-VOTE-PER-STATE election of the President, a sure win for the President Trump due to more Republican controlled states. Of course, if they do this, we will see the greatest riots we have even seen in the history of the country, and the riots will continue until we rise up to stop them.
So what happens, IF in the face of ALL the overwhelming evidence of massive fraud in this election, that I have gathered and chronicled every day since November 4 in MY BLOG, the Supreme Court does not rule in favor of President Trump, AND the Republican controlled State Legislatures of PA, WI, MI, GA, NV, and AZ do not acknowledge the fraud and take back authority to appoint their own Electors in favor of President Trump, AND the US House of Representatives has enough Electoral College votes for Joe Biden and cannot hold a one-vote-per-state election of the President, WHAT CAN PRESIDENT TRUMP DO to save the Republic?
What is The Insurrection Act of 1807? Here is a very detailed article that explains it and WHY President Trump should use it…
The Case for Trump to Invoke Insurrection Act to Restore Election Integrity
The Insurrection Act of 1807
Stephen B. Meister
December 9, 2020 Updated: December 10, 2020
During the presidency of Thomas Jefferson, the 10th Congress enacted the Insurrection Act of 1807.
Jefferson signed the measure into law to foil the plot of Revolutionary War hero Aaron Burr—following the destruction of his political career after he shot and killed Alexander Hamilton in a duel—to raise an army toward establishing his own dynasty in what was then the Louisiana Territory.
The Insurrection Act empowers the president of the United States to deploy U.S. military and federalized National Guard troops to suppress civil disorder, insurrection, and rebellion. Section 252 of the Act states:
Does President Trump have any other options?
Yes and No.
Based on the historical precedent of a president declaring a National Emergency, as a number of presidents have, including President Abraham Lincoln and President Franklin D. Roosevelt, President Trump could do so too.
The “Yes and No” answer as to whether President Trump has the power to declare a National Emergency and Martial Law, and who could or could not TRY to prevent him from doing so is explained in an article by constitutional scholar, Alan Dershowitz…
Dershowitz: Does President Trump have power to declare martial law?
BY ALAN DERSHOWITZ, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR — 06/03/20 10:00 AM EDT
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED BY CONTRIBUTORS ARE THEIR OWN AND NOT THE VIEW OF THE HILL
The Constitution, quite surprisingly, is silent on the issue of martial law and emergency powers. Martial law and emergency powers were not actually uncommon at the founding of the nation, and several state constitutions provided for them in cases of emergency. That silence, however, has not stopped presidents from exercising such powers, generally upon the request and with the cooperation of states.
In more recent history, for instance, President Johnson deployed federal troops to Detroit in 1967 during a riot and once more to Chicago amid violence during the Democratic convention in 1968. He had the blessing of the states and cities in both cases. California requested and received federal troops during the Los Angeles riots in 1992. However, President Eisenhower sent the 101st Airborne Division to Little Rock against the wishes of Arkansas to enforce high school integration in 1957. President Kennedy federalized the National Guard to force integration of the University of Alabama in 1962, also over state objections.
A more compelling and forceful argument for President Trump to declare a National Emergency and Martial Law to remain in office for the sole purpose to save the Republic by bringing all the treasonous parties to justice for their attempted theft of our election, is laid out by General Thomas McInerny in this interview…
If President Trump exercised his legal options to save the Republic by invoking the Insurrection Act of 1807 or declaring a National Emergency and Martial Law to bring to justice all the treasonous parties who perpetrated the bloodless coup attempt against the United States of America’s 2020 presidential election, we will see the greatest riots we have even seen in the history of the country, and the riots will continue until we rise up to stop them.
So as I said at the beginning of this post… As we head toward a resolution of the 2020 Presidential Election, one thing is abundantly clear, we are running full steam ahead into uncharted waters, with a Category 5 storm waiting for us on the January 20, 2021 horizon. There will be widespread violence BROUGHT ON AND FUNDED BY THE RADICAL LEFT and President Trump is going to need the support of the 80-90 million patriots who voted for him.
We need to be prepared for what is coming.
I have a solution.
A prophet’s moving sermon and a politician’s vile threat inspired me to create the solution. Here is what happened…
I had never heard of Sadhu Sundar Selvaraj.
I was not familiar with his religious faith.
When I received his video from one of our members, asking me to watch it because he told me a prophet was speaking about President Trump, the United States of America, and the 2020 Election, I was intrigued. So I clicked the PLAY button.
I was moved to say the least. I believe you will be equally moved.
After I watched the video, I just sat in my office contemplating this prophet’s words. As the leader of Front Sight, and the lightning rod for all the challenges, obstacles, and anti-gun, left wing wacko attacks I have endured over the last 25 years, I personally know how lonely it can be at the top of an organization trying to positively change the world.
The weight on the shoulders of President Trump and the barrage of attacks, challenges, and pressure he has endured over the last four years is quite frankly, unimaginable, even for me. Sadly, it is going to get much worse as January 20, 2021 approaches because our nation is approaching the most critical moment of our lifetimes. As our leader, President Trump may face the challenge of decisions that only our Founding Fathers, General George Washington and President Abraham Lincoln were forced to bear.
As I sat quietly in my office, considering what more I could do to help President Trump, shoulder some of his burden, and show my friend he is not alone in his fight for America, no matter what happens in the coming weeks and beyond, another video was sent to me. This one featured Detroit Michigan Representative Cynthia Johnson. Here it is…
After watching both videos, I knew what to do, and I have done it.
Join me in www.TrumpsArmy.US